Agenda and minutes

Cabinet - Tuesday, 12th July 2022 6.00 p.m.

Venue: Morecambe Town Hall

Contact: Liz Bateson, Democratic Services - email  ebateson@lancaster.gov.uk 

Items
No. Item

9.

Minutes

To receive as a correct record the minutes of Cabinet held on Tuesday, 7 June 2022 (previously circulated). 

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 7 June 2022 were approved as a correct record.

 

10.

Items of Urgent Business Authorised by the Leader

To consider any such items authorised by the Leader and to consider where in the agenda the item(s) are to be considered. 

Minutes:

The Chair advised that there were no items of urgent business.

 

11.

Declarations of Interest

To receive declarations by Councillors of interests in respect of items on this Agenda. 

Councillors are reminded that, in accordance with the Localism Act 2011, they are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests which have not already been declared in the Council’s Register of Interests. (It is a criminal offence not to declare a disclosable pecuniary interest either in the Register or at the meeting). 

Whilst not a legal requirement, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 9 and in the interests of clarity and transparency, Councillors should declare any disclosable pecuniary interests which they have already declared in the Register, at this point in the meeting. 

In accordance with Part B Section 2 of the Code Of Conduct, Councillors are required to declare the existence and nature of any other interests as defined in paragraphs 8(1) or 9(2) of the Code of Conduct. 

 

Minutes:

12.

Public Speaking

To consider any such requests received in accordance with the approved procedure. 

 

Minutes:

Members were advised that there had been no requests to speak at the meeting in accordance with Cabinet’s agreed procedure.

 

13.

UK Shared Prosperity Fund pdf icon PDF 322 KB

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Caroline Jackson)

 

Report of Chief Executive

Minutes:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Caroline Jackson)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Chief Executive to set out the Council’s approach to developing an Investment Plan for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), ahead of a subsequent Cabinet meeting to approve the Investment Plan itself on Tuesday 26 July 2022.  The Lancaster district has been allocated one of the highest levels of funding for a district authority in England and the report set out the key elements of the proposed robust, comprehensive and collaborative approach to developing and delivering a local Investment Plan.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

 

 

Option 1: Approve the recommendations set out in the report

Option 2: Propose amendments to the suggested approach set out in the report

Advantages

Officers and members will be well-placed to continue and finalise a robust, inclusive and comprehensive Investment Plan development process.

With Cabinet as the responsible body for approving the Investment Plan, the views of Cabinet members are highly valuable to shaping the process. As such, the perspectives of members are welcomed in shaping the Investment Plan throughout its development.

Disadvantages

No specific disadvantages to this approach, other than officer and member time and input required to deliver a comprehensive process.

Adjustments to the proposed approach can be accommodated to a certain extent, depending on the level of disruption to the process and the fulfilment of the Investment Plan criteria set by government.

Risks

The timescales for developing and submitting an Investment Plan provide limited time for deliberation both within the council and across the Local Partnership Group. A proactive, transparent and engaging approach is required from all parties to deliver a really successful and transformation Investment Plan.

Any significant disruption to the process could compromise the council’s ability to develop and submit an Investment Plan that fulfils and exceeds the criteria set out by government in the UKSPF Prospectus.

 

The officer preferred option was Option 1. However, as set out in section 7 of the report, the views of Cabinet members were integral to developing and signing off a successful Investment Plan and officers would accommodate the perspectives of members in shaping the Investment Plan wherever possible.

 

Councillor Jackson proposed the recommendations as set out in the report, seconded by Councillor Heath:-

 

“(1)      That Cabinet approve the development of a UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) Investment Plan with the theme of “addressing the Climate Emergency”, seeking to utilise UKSPF investment to support initiatives that will contribute to the district’s environmental and decarbonisation goals.

 

(2)        That Cabinet approve a structure for evaluating UKSPF investments based on the Critical Success Factors set out in section 4 of the report.

 

(3)        That Cabinet consider in principle the possible inclusion of a blend of local investments alongside collaborative initiatives across Lancashire and Morecambe Bay in the Investment Plan, as set out in section 5 of the report.”

 

After some discussion regarding wording and by way of amendment,  ...  view the full minutes text for item 13.

14.

No. 1 Gateway, White Lund Industrial Estate, Morecambe – Roof/Cladding Refurbishment and Other Planned Landlord Works

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hamilton-Cox)

 

Report of Director for Economic Growth & Regeneration  (report to follow)

Minutes:

(This item had been postponed to the meeting on 26 July 2022)

15.

Appointment of Chair for Shareholders' Committee pdf icon PDF 215 KB

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Caroline Jackson)

 

Report of the Head of Housing

Minutes:

Cabinet received a report from the Head of Housing that sought to appoint a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee for Morehomes for the Bay (Developments) Limited and Morehomes for the Bay (Investments) Limited.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

 

Option 1: Appoint a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee (Morehomes for the Bay (Investments) Limited and Morehomes for the Bay (Developments) Limited).

Option 2: Do not appoint a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee (Morehomes for the Bay (Investments) Limited and Morehomes for the Bay (Developments) Limited).

Advantages

The Morehomes for the Bay companies will be able to proceed in bringing forward future related items of business to the Shareholders’ Committee and Cabinet.

None known.

Disadvantages

None known.

Not appointing a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee will result in business of the Companies not being able to be progressed.

Risks

No specific risks known.

Not appointing a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee will result in business of the Companies not being able to be progressed, this will effectively result in the Companies being unable to perform its required functions and being unable to progress any of its intended work.

 

The officer preferred option was Option 1. Appointing a Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee would result in meetings of the Shareholders’ Committee being able to be convened and undertaken and items of required business being able to be brought forward and discussed.

 

Councillor Brookes proposed, seconded by Councillor Wood:-

 

“That the Leader of the Council be appointed as the Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee.”

 

Councillors then voted:-

 

Resolved unanimously:

 

(1)        That the Leader of the Council be appointed as the Chair of the Shareholders’ Committee.

 

 

Officer responsible for effecting the decision:

Head of Housing

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

The decision is consistent with the terms of reference of the Shareholder Committee and enables a Chair to be appointed prior to the first meeting of the Shareholder Committee.