Venue: THIS WILL BE A VIRTUAL MEETING
Contact: Liz Bateson, Democratic Services - email ebateson@lancaster.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes To receive as a correct record the minutes of Cabinet held on Tuesday, 9 February 2021 (previously circulated). Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 9 February 2021 were approved as a correct record.
|
|
Items of Urgent Business Authorised by the Leader To consider any such items authorised by the Leader and to consider where in the agenda the item(s) are to be considered. Minutes: The Chair advised that there were no items of urgent business. |
|
Declarations of Interest To receive declarations by Councillors of interests in respect of items on this Agenda. Councillors are reminded that, in accordance with the Localism Act 2011, they are required to declare any disclosable pecuniary interests which have not already been declared in the Council’s Register of Interests. (It is a criminal offence not to declare a disclosable pecuniary interest either in the Register or at the meeting). Whilst not a legal requirement, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 9 and in the interests of clarity and transparency, Councillors should declare any disclosable pecuniary interests which they have already declared in the Register, at this point in the meeting. In accordance with Part B Section 2 of the Code Of Conduct, Councillors are required to declare the existence and nature of any other interests as defined in paragraphs 8(1) or 9(2) of the Code of Conduct.
Minutes:
The following Councillors had declared an ‘other’ interest in the report on Confirmation of Article 4 Direction - Houses in Multiple Occupation: It was noted they had declared an ‘other’ interest when previous reports concerning Houses of Multiple Occupation were tabled at October’s Cabinet meeting and December’s Cabinet meeting (Minute 63 & 90 refer) and it was confirmed that their ‘other’ interest did not preclude them from voting on the item.
· Councillors Brookes, Jackson & Whitehead lived in one of the areas affected. · Councillor Hamilton-Cox owned a property within the area affected.
|
|
Public Speaking To consider any such requests received in accordance with the approved procedure.
Minutes:
At this point the Chair requested that standing order 17 (Cabinet Procedure Rule 17) be suspended to allow for questions to be taken from all members as the reports were introduced.
The proposal was moved by Councillor Brookes, seconded by Councillor Dowding and there was no dissent to the proposal.
Resolved unanimously:
(1) That Standing Order 17 (Cabinet Procedure Rule 17) be suspended. |
|
Confirmation of Article 4 Direction - Houses in Multiple Occupation PDF 400 KB (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hanson)
Report of Director for Economic Growth & Regeneration Additional documents:
Minutes: (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hanson)
Cabinet received a report from the Director for Economic Growth & Regeneration which sought authority to confirm the Houses in Multiple Occupation Article 4(1) Direction made under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) on 10th November 2020.
The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:
Option 1: Confirm the non-immediate Houses In Multiple Occupation Direction Under Article 4(1) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) and carryout the necessary steps as required by Schedule 3 of the Order.
Advantages: The confirmation of the Article 4 will ensure that the controls come into force on 10th November 2021 and from that date the change of use from Class C3 (dwellinghouses) to Class C4 (small HMOs) will require planning permission thereby enabling policy DM13 of the DMDPD to be implemented effectively. Disadvantages: Greater demands on resources to process planning applications and enforce the policy and Article 4. Risks: Compensation claims may be made but the use of a non-immediate Article 4 will minimise the risk. Option 2: Do not confirm the non-immediate Houses In Multiple Occupation Direction Under Article 4(1) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended). Advantages: No further resources will be required to apply the Article 4 or deal with the increase in applications and enforcement issues arising. Disadvantages: This option would see a continuation of increases in small HMOs, contrary to the aims of policy DM13 and policies SP9 and DM1 which seek to ensure balanced communities. Risks: None
The officer preferred option is Option 1: Confirm the non-immediate Houses In Multiple Occupation Direction Under Article 4(1) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) and carry out the necessary steps as required by Schedule 3 of the Order.
Councillor Hanson proposed, seconded by Councillor Dowding:-
“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”
Councillors then voted:-
Resolved unanimously:
(1) That Cabinet confirms the Direction under Article 4(1) of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended) to remove the permitted development rights for development consisting of a change of use from a Class C3 (dwellinghouse) of the Schedule of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended), to a use falling within Class C4 (houses in multiple occupation) of that Schedule, contained in Class L(b) of Part 3 Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended), in the Lancaster wards of Bulk, Castle, John O’Gaunt, Marsh, Scotforth East, Scotforth West, Skerton East and Skerton West, plus the village of Galgate.
(2) That the Director of Economic Growth and Regeneration be authorised to effect the confirmation of the Article 4 to come into force on 10th November 2021 and to carry out the necessary steps as required by Schedule 3 of ... view the full minutes text for item 119. |
|
Update on the Housing LATCo PDF 388 KB (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Jackson)
Report of Director for Communities and the Environment (report published on 23 February 2021) Additional documents:
Minutes: (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Jackson)
Cabinet received a report from the Director for Communities and the Environment & Director for Economic Growth and Regeneration which asked Cabinet to note the progress in setting up the new Housing LATCo and to approve the new Housing LATCo structure, the arrangements that Cabinet members would become the sole members of the Shareholder Committee, approve the Shareholder Agreement and make budget provision through a loan facility from the Council to the LATCo once incorporated.
The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:
Option 1: Approve the report and proposed governance arrangements with Cabinet agreeing to become members of the Shareholder Committee and approve the loan provision to the LATCo.
Advantages: It allows the timely creation of the governance arrangements and scrutiny function that the Council is seeking to provide for the Housing LATCo. It streamlines the decision making process and administrative arrangements. The loan provision will allow the LATCo to become operational and be TECKAL compliant. Disadvantages: Does create additional responsibilities for Cabinet members and additional administration and support from officers. Risks: Could give rise to confusion about the role of Cabinet members and the Shareholder Committee. Option 2: Do not approve the report and consider alternative arrangements. Advantages: Could remove any confusion/overlap around distinct roles of Cabinet and the Shareholder Committee. Disadvantages: It will create further delays in getting the Housing LATCo established and fully operational. Risks: Loss of opportunity/reputational damage if delays are incurred.
The officer preferred option is Option 1. If the report is approved, it will allow the LATCo to be set up with appropriate governance arrangements in place. Thus, the Housing LATCo can become fully functional allowing the key housing and regeneration priorities already endorsed by Cabinet to be brought into fruition.
Councillor Jackson proposed, seconded by Councillor Dowding:-
“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved”
Councillors then voted:-
Resolved unanimously:
(1) That Cabinet notes that the two distinct Housing Companies have been named Morehomes for the Bay (Investments) Limited and Morehomes for the Bay (Developments) Limited.
(2) That the Board of Directors for both Companies will, subject to appointment by the Shareholder Committee, comprise Executive Team officers.
(3) That Cabinet approves the amended structure of the Housing LATCo.
(4) That Cabinet agrees to become the sole members of the Shareholder Committee for both Companies.
(5) That Cabinet approves the Shareholders Agreement (and any minor modifications needed hereafter) for signing, upon agreement of the document with the Board of Directors.
(6) That Cabinet agrees to delegate to the Chief Finance Officer the negotiation of and arrangements for a loan up to a maximum value of less than £100,000 in order to cover the initial operating costs of the Company. The Loan will be established in a way that is compliant with both Council and Company financial policies and relevant legislation for a LATCo.
Officers responsible for effecting the ... view the full minutes text for item 120. |
|
Delivering Our Priorities: Q1-Q3 2020-21 PDF 443 KB (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Whitehead)
Report of Director of Corporate Services (report published on 23 February 2021) Additional documents: Minutes: (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Whitehead)
Cabinet received a report from the Director of Corporate Services to provide an update with regard to the status of corporate projects and performance indicators; and to set out plans for the future development of monitoring and reporting these including a review of corporate measures, and the establishment of online dashboards containing information relating to each of the Council’s priorities.
No options were provided. Cabinet was requested to consider the updates on projects and performance measures from March – December 2020 (Q1-Q3 2020-21) and approve in principle the approach to developing project, measure and resource monitoring and reporting as set out in the report.
Officers will work with the Cabinet sub-groups, advisory groups and external stakeholders during Q1 and Q2 2021/22 to put in place the new reporting framework and report back on progress each quarter. The changes will be iterative, and existing reporting will be improved to accommodate the new priorities, outcomes and measures.
Councillor Whitehead proposed, seconded by Councillor Hamilton-Cox:-
“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”
Councillors then voted:-
Resolved unanimously:
(1) That the updates on projects and performance measures from March-December 2020 (Q1-Q3 2020-21) at Appendix A to the report be considered and endorsed.
(2) That Cabinet approves in principle the approach to developing project, measure and resource monitoring and reporting set out in this report.
Officer responsible for effecting the decision:
Director of Corporate Services
Reasons for making the decision:
Establishing and developing processes for the monitoring of projects and performance measures will support the Council’s whole range of activity to deliver its priorities and policies. |
|
Appointment to Outside Bodies PDF 358 KB Report of Chief Executive
(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Lewis) Minutes: (Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Lewis)
Cabinet received a report from the Chief Executive to appoint to the vacancies on three outside bodies following the resignation from Cabinet of Councillor Parr. The vacancies related to the Community Safety Partnership, Health and Wellbeing Partnership and the Morecambe Bay Partnership and Cabinet were recommended that the appointments be aligned as closely as possible to Individual Cabinet Members’ portfolios.
It was proposed by Councillor Lewis, seconded by Councillor Frea and resolved unanimously when put to the vote:-
Resolved unanimously:
(1) That Councillor Hartley be appointed to the vacancies on both the Community Safety Partnership and Health & Wellbeing Partnership and that Councillor Brookes be appointed to the vacancy on the Morecambe Bay Partnership and that the Outside Bodies be notified of the revisions.
Officer responsible for effecting the decision:
Chief Executive
Reasons for making the decision:
Representation on Outside Bodies is part of the City Council’s community leadership role and is consistent with the Council’s Plan and Priorities. |