Decisions

Decisions published

01/10/2019 - Reserves Policy ref: 1350    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Made at meeting: 01/10/2019 - Cabinet

Decision published: 07/10/2019

Effective from: 15/10/2019

Decision:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Whitehead)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Director of Corporate Services to consider and approve an updated Reserves Strategy and Action Plan.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

Option 1:  Adopt the Strategy

Advantages

·         Improved clarity with respect to the use of reserves.

·         Greater assurance that reserves expenditure fits with corporate priorities and is appropriately authorised and monitored.

Disadvantages

·         None

Risks

·         The agreement of principles for the use of reserves reduces the risk that reserves expenditure is not adequately controlled which in turn might result in reduced financial resilience.

Option 2:Do not adopt the Strategy

Advantages

·         None

Disadvantages

·         Lack of clarity with respect to using reserves and processes for authorisation and monitoring of reserves will remain unclear.

Risks

·         The lack of an updated Reserves Strategy increases the risks that reserves expenditure is not adequately controlled.

 

The officer preferred option is Option 1.  This option is designed to clarify how reserves are managed and utilised in order to balance the delivery of council priorities with securing financial resilience.

 

In accordance with Part 3 Section 5 Paragraph 2(d) of the Constitution, the Overview and Scrutiny Committee or the Budget and Performance Panel would have the opportunity to comment on the proposals prior to the revised Reserves Strategy being considered at full Council.

 

Councillor Whitehead proposed, seconded by Councillor Parr:-

 

“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”

 

Councillors then voted:-

 

Resolved unanimously:

 

(1)             That the revised Reserves Strategy and Action Plan set out in Appendices One and Two be approved.

(2)             That full Council amend the Budget & Policy Framework to incorporate the amendment to the Reserves Strategy.

 

Officer responsible for effecting the decision:

 

Director of Corporate Services

 

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

The report and appendices provide an update to the Council’s Reserves Strategy to clarify how reserves are managed and utilised in order to balance the delivery of council priorities with securing financial resilience. Any decision to amend the Budget Framework is a function of full Council.  Overview and Scrutiny/Budget & Performance will be consulted on the proposals in accordance with the Constitution prior to their submission to full Council.

 

 


01/10/2019 - Hackney Carriage Fare Review 2019 ref: 1348    Recommendations Approved

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Made at meeting: 01/10/2019 - Cabinet

Decision published: 07/10/2019

Effective from: 15/10/2019

Decision:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Brookes)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Director for Communities and the Environment to consider introducing a new fare tariff in relation to licensed hackney carriages operating in the Lancaster district.  At a meeting on 29 August 2019 the Licensing Committee had, in its capacity as an advisory committee recommended Cabinet’s approval of the new tariffs.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in a report to the Licensing Committee, appended to the agenda, as follows:

 

 

Option 1: Maintain current table of fares approved in 2017.

Option 2: Apply retail price index (RPI) to current flag fall.

Option 3: Apply 20p increase to flag fall

Advantages

Public are aware of expected fares when hiring a hackney carriage.

This seems to be a general approach across County and Country, although not a common approach to all.

Representatives of the trade supported this approach when discussed at the Taxi Working Group

 

 

Disadvantages

The current table of fares has not been reviewed since 2017.

Allows for a minimal increase only (2.1%).

The increase is not supported by an agreed or common methodology that reflects the cost of owning and operating a hackney carriage in the District.

Risks

Drivers may decide to leave the trade, if they decide that the profit is marginal.

Drivers may decide leave the trade, if they decide that the profit is marginal.

Decrease in business for hackney carriages due to fare adjustments.

 

The Officer preferred option is Option 3 to apply an increase of 20p to the initial flag fall.  Applying the tariff increase would seem appropriate so as to help ensure that hackney carriage proprietors receive a reasonable increase in fare income.  The increase reflects necessary and proportionate adjustments, given that there were no increases in fares last year (2018) and the increase in the previous year was marginal, based on the annual RPI.  Any concerns from members of the public will be addressed through the consultation process by placing a notice in the local press proposing the revised tariff.  An amended table of fares, that reflected option 3, was appended to the agenda as Appendix 3.

 

It was reported that there was an error in Appendix 3 and that the tariff 3 should read £5.20 and not £5.00 and this would be amended prior to going out to consultation.

 

 

Councillor Brookes proposed, seconded by Councillor Parr:-

 

“That the recommendations, as set out in the report subject to the amendment to tariff 3 in Appendix 3, as set out above, be approved.”

 

 

Councillors then voted:-

 

Resolved unanimously:

 

(1)          That the new table of fares as recommended by Licensing Committee on 29 August 2019 be approved subject to a revision to Tariff 3, Appendix 3 to read £5.20  and not £5.00.

 

(2)          That the Licensing Manager be authorised to advertise the new table of fares as required by legislation.

 

 

Officer responsible for effecting the decision:

 

Corporate Director for Communities and the Environment

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

The setting of fares is an Executive function as it is not one that is listed in the Local Authorities (Function and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 and therefore falls to the Cabinet to make the final decision whether to approve the increase in charges recommended by Licensing Committee on 29 August 2019.  The decision enables the proposed fares to be published in the local paper and allow for any objections to be considered prior to coming into effect.

 


01/10/2019 - Sale of Wood Street Car Park ref: 1346    Recommendations Approved

That Cabinet approve the sale of Wood Street Car Park.

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Made at meeting: 01/10/2019 - Cabinet

Decision published: 07/10/2019

Effective from: 15/10/2019

Wards affected: Bulk Ward;

Lead officer: Richard Crompton


01/10/2019 - Eden Project North ref: 1347    Recommendations Approved

To progress arrangements with Eden Projects International Ltd

 

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Made at meeting: 01/10/2019 - Cabinet

Decision published: 07/10/2019

Effective from: 15/10/2019

Wards affected: Poulton Ward;

Lead officer: Kieran Keane


01/10/2019 - Digital Strategy ref: 1349    Recommendations Approved

To consider and approve the Lancaster City Council Digital Strategy and Action Plan.

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Made at meeting: 01/10/2019 - Cabinet

Decision published: 07/10/2019

Effective from: 15/10/2019

Decision:

(Cabinet Members with Special Responsibility Councillors Hanson & Hamilton Cox)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Director of Corporate Services to consider and approve the Council’s Digital Strategy.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

Option 1:  Adopt Digital Strategy

Advantages

·         Significant support to the Council’s economic prosperity plan by providing first class digital infrastructure such as full fibre and 5G to support a growing tech sector in the district which promotes high value and green jobs.

·         Focus on partnerships which will enable stakeholders to come together to deliver enhancements in health, innovation, nature and knowledge and tackle issues of social exclusion.

·         The use of digital methodologies at the Council will make it easier for residents to access services whilst making the Council more efficient and agile in order to better utilise its properties and reduce carbon emissions through route optimisation, reduced travel and paperless.

Disadvantages

·         None.

Risks

·         There are risks associated with delivering complex technology projects in order to meet digital ambitions. These risks will be managed as part of the programme and project management processes.

Option 2: Do not adopt the Digital Strategy

Advantages

·         More resource available for other areas of ambition.

Disadvantages

·         The Lancaster district, which has a significant reliance of the technology sector, might fall behind other areas without a current strategy covering digital infrastructures and partnerships.

·         Council services might remain relatively less accessible and the Council would find it more difficult to drive efficiencies without coherent and integrated digital plans.

Risks

·         There are risks that the Lancaster economy and the Council itself will ‘fall behind’ if it is not able to adequately respond to the opportunities provided via digital technology in an organised manner.

 

The officer preferred option is Option 1. 

 

Councillor Hanson proposed, seconded by Councillor Hamilton-Cox:-

 

“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”

 

Councillors then voted:-

 

Resolved unanimously:

 

 

(1)             That the Digital Strategy as set out in the report and Appendix 1, appended to the minutes, be approved.

(2)             That Cabinet pre-approve the principle of funding for infrastructure works in Dalton Square, the establishment of a mechanism for delivering a full fibre network to the Lancaster district and the establishment of a collaborative workspace in Lancaster subject to reserves and capital funding bids being made in accordance with the budget framework.

 

 

Officer responsible for effecting the decision:

 

Director for Corporate Services

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

The Digital Strategy underpins all of the Council’s Ambitions via the delivery of excellent digital infrastructure, partnership and change plans.  The strategy sets out an ambition to work towards a smart district utilising technology to become a clean, green and healthy district that benefits all residents and businesses.

 

Wards affected: (All Wards);

Lead officer: Daniel Bates