Agenda item

To consider the following motion submitted by Councillors Ronnie Kershaw, Carla Brayshaw, Rob Devey and John Reynolds:-

This council notes:

1.           That the Bus Services Bill currently passing through Parliament includes Clause 21 that will effectively “prohibit a local authority from forming a company for the purposes of providing a local bus service”.

2.           That the Localism Act (2011) provides general powers of competence to local authorities.

3.           That municipal bus companies like Reading and Nottingham provide some of the best bus services in the country and have a successful track record of increasing bus passenger numbers and providing high quality bus services.

4.           That polling by We Own It found that a majority of the public (57%) oppose clause 21, whilst just 22% support it. The opposition to Clause 21 is consistent across voters from all political parties.

This council believes:

1.               Clause 21 contradicts the general powers of competence and the spirit of the Localism Act 2011.

2.               If there is a need and a demand from their public, then Councils should be able to provide their own bus services. 

3.               Should they wish, Councils should be legally able to follow the model developed by Reading and Nottingham.

4.               Consequently Clause 21 should be omitted from the Bus Services Bill.

 This council resolves:

1.           To write to Lord Ahmad and to call on the Department for Transport to omit Clause 21 from the final legislation.

2.           To write to local MPs Cat Smith and David Morris to ask them to oppose clause 21 when the Bus Services Bill reaches the House of Commons and ask them to write to Lord Ahmad and the Department of Transport to raise concerns about Clause 21.

3.           To work with any organisations such as We Own It to publicise our opposition to clause 21 in local media.

An officer briefing note is attached.

The following motion of which notice had been given to the Chief Executive in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 15 was moved by Councillor Kershaw and seconded by Councillor Reynolds:

This council notes:

1.           That the Bus Services Bill currently passing through Parliament includes Clause 21 that will effectively “prohibit a local authority from forming a company for the purposes of providing a local bus service”.

2.           That the Localism Act (2011) provides general powers of competence to local authorities.

3.           That municipal bus companies like Reading and Nottingham provide some of the best bus services in the country and have a successful track record of increasing bus passenger numbers and providing high quality bus services.

4.           That polling by We Own It found that a majority of the public (57%) oppose clause 21, whilst just 22% support it. The opposition to Clause 21 is consistent across voters from all political parties.

This council believes:

1.               Clause 21 contradicts the general powers of competence and the spirit of the Localism Act 2011.

2.               If there is a need and a demand from their public, then Councils should be able to provide their own bus services. 

3.               Should they wish, Councils should be legally able to follow the model developed by Reading and Nottingham.

4.               Consequently Clause 21 should be omitted from the Bus Services Bill.

 This council resolves:

1.           To write to Lord Ahmad and to call on the Department for Transport to omit Clause 21 from the final legislation.

2.           To write to local MPs Cat Smith and David Morris to ask them to oppose clause 21 when the Bus Services Bill reaches the House of Commons and ask them to write to Lord Ahmad and the Department of Transport to raise concerns about Clause 21.

3.           To work with any organisations such as We Own It to publicise our opposition to clause 21 in local media.

An officer briefing note was provided with the agenda to assist Councillors.

After a short debate Members voted on the motion.  34 Members voted in favour and 11 abstained, whereupon the Mayor declared the motion to be carried.

Resolved:

This council notes:

1.           That the Bus Services Bill currently passing through Parliament includes Clause 21 that will effectively “prohibit a local authority from forming a company for the purposes of providing a local bus service”.

2.           That the Localism Act (2011) provides general powers of competence to local authorities.

3.           That municipal bus companies like Reading and Nottingham provide some of the best bus services in the country and have a successful track record of increasing bus passenger numbers and providing high quality bus services.

4.           That polling by We Own It found that a majority of the public (57%) oppose clause 21, whilst just 22% support it. The opposition to Clause 21 is consistent across voters from all political parties.

This council believes:

1.           Clause 21 contradicts the general powers of competence and the spirit of the  Localism Act 2011.

2.          If there is a need and a demand from their public, then Councils should be able to provide their own bus services. 

3.        Should they wish, Councils should be legally able to follow the model   developed by Reading and Nottingham.

4.            Consequently Clause 21 should be omitted from the Bus Services Bill.

 This council resolves:

1.           To write to Lord Ahmad and to call on the Department for Transport to omit Clause 21 from the final legislation.

2.           To write to local MPs Cat Smith and David Morris to ask them to oppose clause 21 when the Bus Services Bill reaches the House of Commons and ask them to write to Lord Ahmad and the Department of Transport to raise concerns about Clause 21.

3.           To work with any organisations such as We Own It to publicise our opposition   to clause 21 in local media.