Agenda and minutes

Licensing Act Sub-Committee - Wednesday, 27th July 2016 2.00 p.m.

Venue: Lancaster Town Hall

Contact: Jane Glenton, Democratic Services - telephone: (01524) 582068 or email  jglenton@lancaster.gov.uk 

Items
No. Item

8.

Hustle, Spring Garden Street, Lancaster pdf icon PDF 231 KB

Temporary Event Notice

Additional documents:

Minutes:

APPLICATION FOR TWO TEMPORARY EVENT NOTICES

 

DECISION OF LICENSING ACT SUB-COMMITTEE

 

WEDNESDAY 27TH JULY 2016

 

The Sub-Committee comprised of Councillor Claire Cozler (Chairman),
Councillor Alan Biddulph and Councillor Mel Guilding

 

The Legal Adviser was Luke Gorst, Solicitor.

 

The Democratic Support Officer was Jane Glenton, Democratic Services.

 

An application for two Temporary Event Notices (TENs) on 31st July 2016 and
19th August 2016 had been made under Section 100 of the Licensing Act 2003 by Scott Pilkington in respect of Hustle, 2 Spring Garden Street, Lancaster. The hearing was held in light of a representation against both TENs received from Environmental Health as a relevant person.

 

The applicant was not present but was represented at the hearing by Mr Sam Jones.        

 

Rachel Stainton, Senior Environmental Health Officer, who had made a representation as a relevant person was also present and was accompanied by Georgina Edwards and Nick Wilkinson as her witnesses.

 

The Chair explained the procedure to those present, and stated that the hearing would be a discussion led by the licensing authority.

 

David Eglin, Licensing Enforcement officer, introduced the report, and stated that two TENs had been applied for to include regulated entertainment, the sale by retail of alcohol and the provision of late night refreshment. One of the applications was for a TEN from 04:00 hours to 06:00 hours on 31st July 2016 with the other application for a TEN being from 04:00 hours until 06:00 hours on 19th August 2016.

 

Mrs Stainton then presented the objection to the applications and called her witnesses.

 

Mr Jones then presented the applicant’s case and helped to answer questions.

 

The Sub-Committee then withdrew to make its decision, and sought advice from its legal adviser as to the appropriate phraseology of the decision.

 

DECISION

 

The Sub-Committee has carefully considered all the written information before it, and all the representations and views expressed at the hearing.

 

The Sub-Committee has noted that Mr Jones is the Managing Director at Hustle.

 

This hearing has been held in respect of both TENs as the objection to both is on identical grounds.

 

The Sub-Committee has noted the concerns of Environmental Health relate to the potential for nuisance from the venue late at night. Noise and video recordings were played showing the area immediately outside the venue and from inside the flat opposite.

 

The evidence given by Mr Wilkinson is that the tenants of his flat have been affected by the noise nuisance from hustle. One tenant stated that it was the reason she had to leave the property.

 

Mrs Edwards gave evidence that during a recent TEN at the venue on 9th July 2016, she had been disturbed between the hours of 04:00 and 06:00 by customers outside Hustle.

 

Mr Jones gave evidence that, in the 12 months since he has been in charge at the premises, he has received no complaints about noise so this hearing had come as a surprise to him. He stated that he had been granted TENs  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8.