Agenda and minutes

Application to Transfer a Premises Licence

DECISION OF LICENSING ACT SUB-COMMITTEE

TUESDAY 1 APRIL 2014

THE IVORY LOUNGE, 25 NORTH ROAD LANCASTER

APPLICATION TO TRANSFER PREMISES LICENCE

The Sub-Committee comprised of Councillor Mike Greenall (Chairman), Councillor Helen Helme and Councillor Roger Sherlock

The Legal Adviser was Luke Gorst, Solicitor.

The Democratic Support Officer was Tom Silvani, Democratic Services.

An application had been made under section 42 of the Licensing Act 2003 to transfer the premises licence for The Ivory Lounge, 25 North Road, Lancaster to Minted Leisure Ltd, trading as Dirty Buddha Nightclub.

The police had submitted an objection to the application by giving a Notice under section 42(6) and (7) of the Licensing Act 2003.

Sgt David Forshaw represented the Police, who had made the application on the grounds of the prevention of crime and disorder.

The applicant was represented by Andrea Forrest of MG Legal Solutions. Matt Baron a director of the applicant, and the manager David Benson were also present.

The Chairman explained the procedure to those present, and stated that the hearing would be a discussion led by the licensing authority, and any questions would be put through the Chairman.

David Eglin, Licensing Officer, introduced the report, and stated that the application had been for the transfer to have immediate effect from the date of application and therefore Minted Leisure Ltd is currently the premises licence holder pending the outcome of the hearing.

Sgt Forshaw then presented the police case and requested that the transfer of the premises licence to the applicant should be refused as it would undermine the crime prevention objective to allow the applicant to continue as the premises licence holder. 

Ms Forrest then presented the applicant’s case and Mr Baron helped answer questions.

After summing up, the Sub-Committee withdrew to make its decision, and sought advice from its legal adviser as to the appropriate phraseology of the decision.

DECISION

The Sub-Committee has noted that the application relates to the transfer of the licence to Minted leisure Ltd who were initially trading as Dirty Buddha Nightclub.

The Sub-Committee have to consider whether the exceptional circumstances surrounding the transfer are such that the transfer will lead to the undermining of the crime and disorder prevention objective.

Guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003 states:-

“In exceptional circumstances where the Chief Officer of Police believes the transfer may undermine the crime prevention objective, the police may object to the transfer. Such objections are expected to be rare and arise because the police have evidence that the business or individuals seeking to hold the licence or business or individuals linked to such persons are involved with crime (or disorder)”

 The Sub-Committee has carefully considered all the written information before it and all the representations and views expressed at the hearing

The Sub-Committee has heard evidence from the police that they are objecting on effectively two grounds.

Firstly the naming of the bar “Dirty Buddha”, and secondly to the applicant company due to personnel associated with Minted Leisure Ltd.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 1.