Issue - meetings

Retrospective application for a pole mounted light/camera and associated cabinet.

Under the scheme of public participation, resident Sarah Fishwick spoke against the application.

It was proposed by Councillor Martin Gawith and seconded by Councillor Robert Redfern:

“That the application be approved subject to the conditions in the Committee Report.”

Upon being put to the vote, one Councillor voted in favour of the proposal with 14 against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been rejected.

It was proposed by Councillor Alan Greenwell and seconded by Councillor Philip Bradley:

“That the application be refused for the following reason:

·         the pole mounted light/camera and associated cabinet would have a significant detrimental impact upon the designated National Landscape that would not conserve or preserve its special quality and would be contrary to policies DM29 and DM46 and the National Planning Policy Framework.”

Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.

Resolved:

That the application be refused for the following reason:

·         the pole mounted light/camera and associated cabinet would have a significant detrimental impact upon the designated National Landscape that would not conserve or preserve its special quality and would be contrary to policies DM29 and DM46 and the National Planning Policy Framework.