135 Morecambe Business Improvement District (BID) Renewal- Draft Proposal PDF 408 KB
(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hanson)
Report of Director for Economic Growth & Regeneration
Additional documents:
Minutes:
(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hanson)
Cabinet received a report from the Director for Economic Growth & Regeneration that provided context and information for the endorsement of proposals for a Morecambe Business Improvement District (BID) Renewal Ballot (closing on 29th July 2021) as required by statutory provisions. The report updated Members on the pre- and post- ballot issues and resource implications in relation to the city council’s role in the BID renewal process. As the council was a potential levy payer, Members were asked to decide on council’s voting intention in the BID Renewal ballot – yay, nay or abstain.
The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:
Option 1: Do nothing (Put off decision until the production of Final Renewal Proposals)
Advantages: No advantages.
Disadvantages: Creates uncertainty for Morecambe BID. Creates difficulties for Morecambe BID in developing its pre-ballot canvassing strategy and marketing/publishing activities around the BID Renewal Proposals.
Risks: Due to the impact of Covid-19 this Cabinet meeting is the last date proposals can formally be endorsed for July ballot to be comfortably enacted under statutory notifications. If there are issues with Renewal Proposal compliance at this stage a ballot could be delayed with knock on implications for Morecambe BID in terms of canvassing and for the council in terms of dealing with operational matters arising from a late ‘Yes’ ballot.
Option 2: Endorse the draft BID Renewal Proposals with endorsement of final BID Renewal Proposals delegated to the Chief Executive.
Advantages: Timely notice that the proposals are technically sound, and the final document is likely to be compatible with BID Regulations and council policy. Allows for minor and/or non-material technical amendments via officer scrutiny of final Renewal Proposals document. Allows Morecambe BID to continue to develop its pre-election canvassing strategy and marketing/publishing activities around the BID Renewal Proposals with confidence.
Disadvantages: No disadvantages identified.
Risks: No guarantee that BID Renewal Ballot will be successful.
Option 3: Request material amendments to the draft Renewal Proposal for consideration/ endorsement at a future Cabinet meeting.
Advantages: This would only be if it were considered (based on the draft) that a Final Renewal Proposal would be vetoed because matters contained conflict with council policy and extensive material changes are required. Allows for revised proposals to come forward which are compatible with council policy and regulatory requirements.
Disadvantages: Reputational implications for council if proposals are not endorsed without good reason. Potential delays Morecambe BID’s commitment to pre-ballot canvassing strategy and marketing/publishing activities around the BID Renewal Proposals.
Risks: If there are issues with compatibility with the council’s policy framework the onus would be on Morecambe BID to address any issues and prepare a technically/policy compatible Final Renewal Proposal. Risks are as Option 1 in that this Cabinet is, realistically, the last date proposals can formally be endorsed by Cabinet for a ballot to be enacted under the current statutory notification timetable.
On submission of a Final Renewal Proposal the ... view the full minutes text for item 135