Issue - meetings
Bay Scaffolding, Northgate, White Lund Industrial Estate, Morecambe
Meeting: 25/06/2018 - Planning Regulatory Committee (Item 23)
23 Bay Scaffolding, Northgate, White Lund Industrial Estate, Morecambe 
PDF 273 KB
Demolition of factory building and erection of
4 industrial units, installation of a raised replacement roof and
erection of a single storey infill extension to the front and first
floor side extension to existing industrial unit
Minutes:
|
18/00234/FUL |
Demolition of factory building and erection of 4 industrial units, installation of a raised replacement roof and erection of a single storey infill extension to the front and first floor side extension to existing industrial unit. |
Westgate Ward |
A |
A site visit was held in respect of this site location on 6th November 2017 minute 80 (2017/2018) refers.
It was proposed by Councillor Sylvia Rogerson and seconded by Councillor Jane Parkinson:
“That the application be approved.”
(The proposal was contrary to the case officer’s recommendation that the application be refused).
Members clarified the reasons for the contrary proposal, being that, the applicant had provided sufficient justification for the loss of the non-designated heritage asset.
Upon being put to the vote, 5 Members voted in favour of the proposition and 7 against, with 1 abstention, whereupon the Vice-Chairman declared the proposal to be lost.
Councillor Eileen Blamire left the meeting at this point and did not return. Councillor Blamire did not participate in the rest of the voting on this item.
It was then proposed by Councillor Colin Hartley and seconded by Councillor Ian Clift:
“That the application be refused.”
Upon being put to the vote, 5 Members voted in favour of the proposition and 5 against, with 2 abstentions, whereupon the Vice-Chairman in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 19.2, used her casting vote and declared the proposal to be lost by virtue of her casting vote.
It was then proposed by Councillor Sylvia Rogerson and seconded by Councillor Jane Parkinson:
“That the application be approved.”
Upon being put to the vote, 5 Members voted in favour of the proposition and 5 against, with 2 abstentions, whereupon the Vice-Chairman in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 19.2, used her casting vote and declared the proposal to be carried by virtue of her casting vote.
Resolved:
|
That Planning Permission be approved and subject to the following conditions:
|
1. Standard 3 year timescale.
2. Development in accordance with list of approved plans.
3. Standard contamination condition.
4. Tree protection measures and Arboricultural Method Statement.
5. Surface water drainage scheme and management plan.
6. Foul drainage.
7. Details of all materials – roof, walls, doors, windows, surface treatments.
8. Details of security measures – CCTV, external lighting, boundary treatments and gates.
9. Secure and covered cycle storage within the buildings.
10. Car parking and turning areas to be marked out and provided in full prior to occupation of any unit, and retained at all times thereafter for their intended purpose.
11. Provision of oil interceptor to parking/turning areas.
12. Hours of construction 0800-1800 Mon to Sat.
13. No external storage.