Issue - meetings

Arts Commissioning

Meeting: 02/09/2014 - Cabinet (Item 37)

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Sands)

Report of Chief Officer (Regeneration & Planning)

Additional documents:

Minutes:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Sands)

Cabinet received a report from the Chief Officer (Regeneration & Planning) which advised on the proposed means of managing the Council’s funding for Arts in the district, in line with Corporate Plan priorities.

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

	Option 1: Move to a commissioning approach for investment in the Arts by April 2017	Option 2: Introduce a grants scheme
Advantages	Agreed outcomes provide clarity on what the City Council wishes to achieve as a result of investment in the Arts Improved information on need/ demand and impact as a result of assessment and analysis A fair and transparent framework for investment decisions Competitive process provides assurance of Value for Money Generation of new ideas as a result of creative input from Arts providers A three year commissioning cycle provides an opportunity to plan and develop Arts provision more strategically Potential opportunity to work strategically with other funders.	Some assurance of Value for Money Fairness and transparency provided as part of a competitive process Potentially requires less officer time than commissioning to establish, although overall work will be dependent on numbers of applicants for bidding rounds
Disadvantages	Creates uncertainty over future investment for existing SLA partners Significant officer time required and it is likely there will be competing priorities	The City Council’s strategic approach to investment in Arts in the district would not be developed No opportunity for research and engagement to inform the development of strategic outcomes Potential gaps in service provision Impact limited to projects coming forward
Risks	Potential short term risk to Arts funding coming in to the district, as a result of uncertainty. Can be mitigated by clear communications with funding partners.	Management of expectations is a key risk with most grant schemes. Some mitigation can be achieved by clear scheme communications.

The Officer Preferred Option is Option 1 as this provides a more strategic, long term approach to arts investment with the potential for improved outcomes that are clearly linked to the Council’s priorities. Engagement with arts providers as part of the commissioning process is more likely to lead to the development of quality services that are informed by the needs and preferences of audiences.

The Council has invested in Arts in the district for many years and as a result of this and additional investment by, in particular, Lancashire County Council and the Arts Council, the district has a strong and growing creative arts economy. This offer is of great value to visitors, both local and from further afield, but also makes an important contribution to quality of life for local communities. In economic terms, quality of life is also a key component of the offer to potential inward investors, companies wishing to locate and invest in the district.

Councillor Hanson proposed, seconded by Councillor Blamire:-

“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”

Councillors then voted:-

Resolved unanimously:

(1) That ... view the full minutes text for item 37