Issue - meetings

Second Homes Funding 2012-13

Meeting: 24/07/2012 - Cabinet (Item 36)

36 Second Homes Funding 2012-13 PDF 120 KB

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Blamire)

Report of the Head of Community Engagement

Minutes:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Blamire)

Cabinet received a report from the Head of Community Engagement to consider and confirm arrangements for application and decision making processes for Second Homes Funding for 2012 – 2013.

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

	Advantages	Disadvantages	Risks
Option 1 A two fold process to include smaller and larger grants with indicative allocations	Flexible approach that allows funds to be steered towards projects of all sizes Inclusive and accessible for organisations of all sizes and varying capacity Allows investment in both larger, collaborative initiatives with longer term benefits and also specific initiatives assisting individual organisations and the services they deliver Likely to promote good value for money by encouraging applications for funding at levels appropriate to the size and scope of the project	Range of proposals likely to be broader making decision making processes more complex	Categories will need to be treated separately to ensure fair consideration of bids
Option 2 All grants limited to £10,000, or agreed alternative ceiling, to support individual bids to support development and sustainability	Easier to access for all eligible organisations Possible to approve more individual applications	Larger initiatives creating higher, longer term benefits would not be eligible. No scope to underpin support structures which are required by many organisations Lost chance to increase sustainability, develop sector wide opportunities and achieve efficiencies in relation to VCF and Arts organisations for the future Administrative costs likely to increase	None specifically noted
Option 3 All grants limited to £50,000 or agreed alternative ceiling, to support larger collaborative bids to create longer term sustainable benefits across organisations	All funds focused on larger initiatives with wider and longer term benefits	Likely to exclude smaller organisations Likely to preclude specific, smaller scale but useful initiatives	None specifically noted
Option 4 Carnforth Local Information Centre is funded, at this stage, within Options 1 and 2	This would provide the funding to allow the Information Centre to continue for a further two years	No means of assessing the proposal against scheme criteria No current arrangements in place to assist other organisations facing immediate difficulty.	No clear business plan has been submitted and assessed so no way to ascertain whether the Information Centre will be able to operate at a sustainable level after funding has ceased

The officer preferred option was Option 1. This approach was accessible to more potential applicants and encouraged a broader range of proposals. Any additional complexity arising from this was likely to be very manageable within the processes proposed.

Cabinet members views were sought on Option 4, which could be considered alongside the funding arrangements described in Option 1 or 2.

Councillor Barry proposed, seconded by Councillor Blamire:-

“(1) Cabinet approves the proposed arrangements to allocate £294,808 of Second Homes Funding through an open bidding process to Voluntary, Community, Faith and Arts organisations including Friends Groups.

(2) That the fund is promoted as the Take ... view the full minutes text for item 36