9 West End Masterplan Mid-term Review PDF 45 KB
Report of the Corporate Director (Regeneration).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Archer)
(Councillor Robinson, who had requested to address Cabinet as a Harbour Ward Councillor, spoke to this item.)
The Corporate Director (Regeneration) submitted a report updating members on the Mid-term Review of the West End Masterplan and recommendations arising from appraisal and outline the next steps in implementing and maintaining local scrutiny of the refreshed priorities.
The Masterplan options, options analysis, including risk assessment, were set out in the report as follows:
The following options have been identified:
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Risks |
1. Do nothing – make no decision on West End Masterplan priorities. |
No advantages identified. |
No clear statement of direction, in either strategic or development terms, of Council priorities for economic regeneration in the West End. |
Potential for ‘drift’, confusion and waste in allocation of financial and human resources in development and delivery.
|
2. Cabinet endorses Mid-term review recommendations and implementation plan and notes the independent appraisal and consultation feedback appended to the report.
|
Clear commitment to and direction for economic and housing regeneration work in the West End.
Independent appraisal has endorsed recommendations.
The West End Partnership has been consulted and provided formal feedback that has led to some changes in priority.
|
Although formal community consultation feedback has been received appraisal process has essentially been officer led.
|
Usual risks associated with practical delivery relating to achieving development funding, managing and shaping projects and initiatives.
|
While the focus of the review is around the economic regeneration theme, it should be noted that particular economically ‘low ranking’ proposals may find support within the LDLSP’s other Thematic Groups and their associated priorities. Essentially the West End Masterplan Mid-term Review and the implementation plan is a programme rather than a collection of individual projects. It provides a strategic overview and a framework for any projects that are supported. As individual projects are developed they will be subject to detailed internal appraisal and conform to the Council’s project management systems.
Option 2 is the Officer preferred option as this providesa clear commitment and direction for economic and housing regeneration work in the West End through the stated priorities and outline implementation plan. Cabinet can be reassured by the fact that the projects and recommendations have been subject to independent appraisal and community consultation.
The Local Governance and Scrutiny of Masterplan implementation options, options analysis, including risk assessment, were set out in the report as follows:
Option |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Risks/Issues |
1. Do nothing |
Council has no view on the future governance and community scrutiny of Masterplan projects/ proposals. No advantages identified. |
No clear Council position on local engagement in strategic or implementation for the West End. |
‘Drift’ and uncertainty of position in relation to local engagement in ongoing West End proposals/projects. |
2. New Morecambe Parish Council takes on West End ‘local engagement’ – potentially through its own sub-group or WEP.
|
The Parish Council can make a decision on resourcing ‘neighbourhood’ level input. It may choose to develop a new West End focus ... view the full minutes text for item 9 |