Decision details

Fly Tipping Strategy

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations Approved (subject to call-in)

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

To consider, review and adopt the districts fly tipping strategy for 2026-2031

Decisions:

(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hart)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Chief Officer – Environment & Place

to consider, review and adopt the Fly Tipping Strategy for the district.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

Option 1 would be for the authority not to adopt the strategy and accept that the current management of fly tipping in the district is acceptable and palatable in relation to the financial and resource needed to maintain this standard of service to residents. Whilst this would not be consistent with the authority’s ambitions around improving quality public spaces, it is an option none the less given the other ambitions which the Council may choose to focus on, as outlined within the Council Plan 2024-2027.

 

Option 2 is the strategy as outlined within the body of the report and appendix 1. This is planned within the current operational structures and requires minimal investment in regard to financial or staffing resource. The approach is ambitious and looks to lower fly tipping and increase resident satisfaction over a five year period.

 

 

 

Option 1: Do nothing – Reactive approach

 

Option 2: 5 year planned approach

 

Advantages

None identified

·       Publicly articulates a plan for tackling an issue close to residents

·       Planned, tactical approach to Fly Tipping which aligns to corporate plan

·       Delivered within current staffing resource

 

Disadvantages

·       No clear plan or ambition for tackling fly tipping

·       Acceptance of a reactive approach

 

5 year plan subject to changes in corporate priorities

Risk of plan becoming outdated in local circumstances change

Risks

·       The issue of fly tipping grows in number, and causes increased financial and resource burden

Reputational impact from residents

Reduction in fly tipping isn’t realised

 

                      The options available to the Council are outlined in paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3 of the report and all offer advantages and disadvantages. Any decision moving forward should consider a balanced approach to residents whilst taking into account the national strategy, financial position of the authority and operational efficiency.

 

                      Option 2 is the officer preferred option – to approve the proposed strategy to move towards a more planned and structured approach to Fly Tipping.  It is felt that this will contribute to a smoother operation and be kinder to the public in knowing what is required on their behalf. 

 

Councillor Hart proposed, seconded by Councillor Riches:-

 

“That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”

 

By way of amendment, Councillor Hamilton-Cox proposed and Councillor Maddocks seconded:- “that the maximum fixed penalty notice be increased to £1K.” 

This was not accepted as a friendly amendment by Councillor Hart.

 

Following advice from the Monitoring Officer, it was decided the amendment was unsuitable for the current strategy document. The amendment was withdrawn for future consideration.

 

By way of an amendment to the operational action plan within the strategy Councillor Caroline Jackson proposed ‘that the phrases short term medium term and long term should be replaced by actual specific dates where possible with officers determining which actions became dates and which remained as short term, medium term or long term.”

 

This was accepted as a friendly amendment.

 

Councillors then voted on the recommendations, as revised :-

 

Resolved unanimously:

 

(1)               That the Fly Tipping Strategy 2026-2031 as attached within appendix 1 to the report be approved and adopted.

(2)               That the operational action plan attached to the report in appendix 2 be revised with the phrases short term, medium term and long term replaced by actual specific dates where possible with officers determining which actions became dates and which remained as short term, medium term or long term.

 

Officer responsible for effecting the decision:

 

Chief Officer - Environment & Place

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

This front facing operational strategy aligns to the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and the Councils corporate enforcement policy.

The strategy will contribute positively to reduced public health and safety and offers a consistent service to all communities regardless of socio-economic status, ethnicity or geographical location and endeavours for all to benefit from a cleaner environment.

 

Having approved the preferred officer option, Council services will be able to start the implementation work stream as set out in the report and look to articulate the changes to residents.

 

Report author: William Griffith

Publication date: 09/12/2025

Date of decision: 02/12/2025

Decided at meeting: 02/12/2025 - Cabinet

Date comes into force if not called in: 17/12/2025

Call-in deadline date: 16/12/2025

Current call-in Count: 0

Accompanying Documents: