Decision details

Business Improvement Districts for Lancaster and Morecambe

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

To provide background information on the concept of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) and update members on work towards the establishment of BIDs in Lancaster and Morecambe.

Decisions:


(Cabinet Member with Special Responsibility Councillor Hanson)

 

Cabinet received a report from the Head of Regeneration and Policy to provide background information on the concept of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) and update members on work towards the establishment of BIDs in Lancaster and Morecambe.

 

The options, options analysis, including risk assessment and officer preferred option, were set out in the report as follows:

 

Although the report was primarily provided to update Members the following options could be considered:

 

 

 

Advantages

Disadvantages

Risks

Option 1: Do nothing

No advantages.

 

 

 

 

 Loss of credibility with business community. 

No contribution to council’s Corporate objectives.

Council may be in breach of statutory duties to support BID proposer as defined in BID legislation. 

Option 2: Continue with preparations for introduction of BIDs in partnership with Lancaster Chamber in Lancaster and with  the local trade associations in Morecambe

Successful BID should have benefits for the local authority as well as the business community.

Clear and credible leadership for the business community to identify with.

Potential for more effective use of council resources and innovation in town centre service delivery.

Should engender a closer relationship between business community and statutory service providers.

Fosters improved and clearer communication and genuine partnership with business

Effective opportunity for local businesses to have a voice on subjects relating to the environment in which they trade.

No guarantee that BID ballot in Lancaster or Morecambe would ultimately be successful.

Allocated resource for BID proposer/partnership to move to ‘BID readiness’ will need to be supplemented by council officer resources. 

Relatively long lead in period to ensure best possible chance of success.

Council and officer resources required pre and post ballot which need to be fully defined and understood.

Implications for council and other statutory services of committing to ‘baseline’ service provision over BID lifetime may reduce flexibility. 

Option 3: Explore alternative routes / partnerships for introduction of BIDs in Lancaster and Morecambe

Could have same benefits as Option 2 although development could take longer.

As Option 2 but with the addition that it is difficult to see an alternative partnership/route to BID implementation that has credibility in the business community.

As Option 2 but even more difficult and time consuming to get to ballot stage  

 

Option 2 was the Officer preferred option.  There was a clear way forward for Lancaster BID and emerging consensus for progression of the Morecambe BID.  The BID officer working group should ensure that any issues arising from BID Proposal development and pre/post ballot resource implications for both Lancaster and Morecambe were addressed in partnership with the BID proposer.

 

The Lancaster Chamber and NWLCC had confirmed that the resources agreed for the Lancaster BID were sufficient for the purposes of BID Proposal development.  This follows the experience of NWLCC in successfully progressing the Preston BID through both proposal and implementation stages.  The outcome of a BID ballot could not be guaranteed but officers believed the relationships being built and the direction emerging gave the best chance of a successful outcome.                  

 

 

Councillor Hanson proposed, seconded by Councillor Smith:-

 

(1)       “That the recommendations, as set out in the report, be approved.”

 

Councillors then voted:-

 

Resolved:

 

(7 Members (Councillors Barry, Blamire, Bryning, Hanson, Leytham, Sands and Smith) voted in favour,  and 1  Member  (Councillor  Hamilton-Cox) abstained.)

 

 

(1)     Members note the preparations for the introduction of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in partnership with Lancaster District Chamber and the local trade associations in Morecambe.

 

(2)     Members support the intention of Lancaster District Chamber to lead on BID Proposal development in Lancaster city centre.

 

(3)     Members approve the allocation of £40K (subject to carry forward approval) for Lancaster town centre BID development to the Lancaster Chamber via a formal funding agreement administered through the Regeneration & Policy service.      

 

(4)     That Councillor Hanson be appointed as Cabinet’s nomination to sit on the Lancaster Bid Steering Group.

 

(5)     Future decisions in respect of BID Proposal lead, the use of allocated funds and Cabinet nominee to sit on a Steering Group (or similar body) for Morecambe town centre is dealt with via an Individual Cabinet Member Decision.   

 

 

Officers responsible for effecting the decision:

 

Head of Regeneration and Policy

 

Reasons for making the decision:

 

It is accepted by most local authorities active in this field that BIDs create an effective opportunity for local businesses to have a voice and direct impact on subjects relating to the environment and circumstances in which they trade. Development of BIDs has been proven to help build business and encourage local economic growth. 

In working towards implementation of Business Improvement Districts the council will be achieving and/or reviewing and improving upon a number of its corporate objectives/outcomes as defined in the Corporate Plan 2011-14 in relation to Economic regeneration (Visitor Economy), Statutory responsibilities, Partnership working and community leadership.  Additionally, the implementation of BIDs is a key priority of the recently approved Lancaster Cultural Heritage Strategy.

Report author: Paul Rogers

Publication date: 02/08/2011

Date of decision: 26/07/2011

Decided at meeting: 26/07/2011 - Cabinet

Effective from: 10/08/2011

Accompanying Documents: