Agenda and minutes

Licensing Act Sub-Committee - Wednesday, 20th January 2010 10.30 a.m.

Venue: Lancaster Town Hall

Contact: Tom Silvani, Democratic Services - 01524 582132 - Email: tsilvani@lancaster.gov.uk 

Items
No. Item

1.

West End Late Shop 3, 39 Alexandra Road, Morecambe pdf icon PDF 30 KB

Application for a premises licence to be granted under the Licensing Act 2003.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

DECISION OF LICENSING ACT  SUB-COMMITTEE

 

WEDNESDAY 20TH JANUARY 2010

 

WEST END LATE SHOP No 3

 

 

The Sub-Committee comprised of Councillor Janie Kirkman (Chairman), Councillor Bob Roe and Councillor Paul Woodruff

 

The Legal Adviser was Luke Gorst, Assistant Solicitor.

 

The Democratic Support Officer was Tom Silvani, Democratic Services.

 

An application for a premises licence had been made by Sinnathamby Vijitharan under Section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 in respect of the West End Late Shop No 3, 39 Alexandra Road, Morecambe LA3 1RN

 

The hearing was held in light of three representations from interested parties living in the vicinity of the premises.

 

The applicant of the proposed premises, Mr Vijitharan, was present at the hearing.                        

 

Interested parties who had made representations, Mrs Lean, Mrs Thevathas and Councillor Robinson were present at the hearing.

 

All parties were informed that the members of the Sub-Committee knew one of the interested parties, Councillor Robinson, in their capacity as Lancaster City Councillors only.

 

The Chairman explained the procedure to those present, and stated that the hearing would be a discussion led by the licensing authority, and any questions would be put through the Chairman.

 

The Senior Licensing Officer, Caroline Morrison, introduced the report and stated that, whilst initially the Police had objected to the application, they had now withdrawn their representation after agreeing a number of conditions with the applicant.

 

Interested parties then presented their representations against the application.

 

Mr Vijitharan then presented the applicant’s case and helped answer questions.

 

After summing up by the parties, the Sub-Committee withdrew to make its decision, and sought advice from its legal adviser as to the appropriate phraseology of the decision.

 

 

DECISION

 

The Sub-Committee has taken this application on its merits having carefully considered all the written information before it, and all the representations and views expressed at the hearing.

 

The Sub-Committee has noted that the initial licence application was to enable the premises to sell alcohol for consumption off the premises from 0600 hours until midnight every day from the premises and for 24 hour provision for sales via internet and telephone orders. The Sub-Committee understands that the applicant has agreed to amend his application to sell alcohol from the premises from 0900 hours until 2200 hours every day with the 24 hour provision for internet and phone sales remaining.

 

The Sub-Committee has noted the concerns of the interested parties as to the potential for public nuisance and the protection of children from harm given the proximity of schools in the area and the potential for morning alcohol sales.

 

The Sub-Committee has taken the view that the hours requested in the application for internet and telephone sales are excessive particularly given that the premises is situated in a residential area and people will have to get up for work and school in the morning.

 

The premises will therefore close to the public between the hours of 2200 hours and 0900 hours the following day for the sale of alcohol from the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 1.